Long-term nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in sixteen consecutive patients with bronchiectasis: a retrospective study.

نویسندگان

  • A Gacouin
  • B Desrues
  • H Léna
  • M L Quinquenel
  • J Dassonville
  • P Delaval
چکیده

Life expectancy and quality of life are poor in patients with chronic respiratory failure due to bronchiectasis. The indication for nocturnal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) remains controversial in chronic obstructive lung disease. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether some of the objectives of home mechanical ventilation, i.e. improvement in blood gas values and reduced length of hospitalization, were fulfilled by NIPPV and oxygen plus medical treatment in patients with chronic respiratory failure due to bronchiectasis. Sixteen consecutive patients (12 females and four males; mean age 57 +/- 11 yrs) with chronic respiratory failure due to bronchiectasis, treated at home with nocturnal NIPPV in addition to oxygen therapy, were retrospectively studied in terms of blood gas values and duration of hospitalization before and after NIPPV. Details of the therapy received by each patient were recorded. Nine patients agreed to complete a questionnaire to determine their perception of the benefits of the treatment. NIPPV was performed using a volumetric respirator and was applied with a customized nasal mask modelled with silicone paste. NIPPV was used for a mean of 26 months (range 0.5-60 months). Eleven patients were alive 12 months after use of NIPPV. No significant improvement in blood gas values was noted on room air during NIPPV, but arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) stabilized after the period of worsening observed before initiation of NIPPV. Duration of hospitalization, the year before and the year after NIPPV, was 19 (3-40) and 16 (8-37) days, respectively (NS). For the 11 patients who were alive 2 yrs after the start of NIPPV, duration of hospitalization the year before NIPPV and between 12 and 24 months after NIPPV were 17 (4-40) and 7 (2-27) days, respectively (p < 0.05). Nine patients who had received NIPPV for at least 12 months at the time of the study reported an improvement in their quality of life. The results suggest that home ventilatory support by nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation offers an acceptable alternative to tracheotomy, with less discomfort, in the management of severe respiratory failure due to bronchiectasis, in order to allow the patient to return home. These results should be confirmed by controlled studies.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effectiveness of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration

Background Non-invasive ventilation is increased used in preterm infants. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after less invasive surfactant administration (LISA). Materials and Methods In this clinical trial, eighty ...

متن کامل

A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Background Infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS) is one of the main causes of serious complications and death in preterm infants. Both Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) are known as the most common treatment strategies for IRDS. The present study intended to compare NCPAP and NIPPV in the treatment of preterm inf...

متن کامل

A Comparison between Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a non-invasive ventilatory mode, which delivers mechanical ventilation via nasal tubes or prongs. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of NIPPV and nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (NCPAP) in reducing the need for intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)....

متن کامل

Management of chronic alveolar hypoventilation by nasal ventilation.

This is a study of the effect of nocturnal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on symptoms of chronic alveolar hypoventilation (CAH), sleep oxygen saturation (SaO2), and frequency of hospitalization of patients with progressive neuromuscular respiratory insufficiency or restrictive lung disease from thoracic wall deformity. The nocturnal use of NIPPV is explored in combinat...

متن کامل

Outcome of domiciliary nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in restrictive and obstructive disorders.

BACKGROUND Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a new technique which has rapidly supplanted other non-invasive methods of ventilation over the last 5-10 years. Data on its effectiveness are limited. METHODS The outcome of long term domiciliary NIPPV has been analysed in 180 patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure predominantly due to chest wall restriction, neuro...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The European respiratory journal

دوره 9 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996